Wanted: Citizenship in a free, human state, where violence is the declared enemy and criminal - violence, not people!
Call all over the world,
call over our planet
- can U hear me?
I'd like 2
leave
germany
-
could
be ready
2 go and come
2
U - yet unknownpeaceful people,
living tolerance and kindness
since a certain time,
not just for a few
weeks
!
<<< >>>
This
is not necessarily
a MUST 2 be filfullid,
but, of course, it would be
the optimum,
I'd prefer.
<<< >>>
The core of SHOULD seems 2 be 4 me
the xperience in living 2gehter
in a friendly, positive way,
constructive in critizising,
caring 4 one-another
in the real meaning
of
caring 4 Ur next,
which leaves
all freedom
in thinking, saying and doing
until
it
becomes
a violent act 2 one other
-
which
should be the first forbid
of the small book
'forbidden-list',
vthat
would in perfection
contain
the
one&only
page of this utopian book,
'the 1-pager no.1'
.
Because
God's will is:
no
forbid
except
these of my law.
no
human
shall forbid
an other human
anything,
except
4 2
forbid
the others
violating ones own will
what
the
own body
shall do, shall be,
shall be done 2:
the
own body
is Gods gift 2 a soul,
it belongs the soul,
that
has been given
that body
-
but
noone other,
from
the first days on til the last ones.
This should be first base-right,
garanteed by the state
not to be touched
by anyone
of
all citizen
!
Everything
above this right
can be only
lexi tempi,
shortlex,
obsol
ete
in
s
pee,
periodically
tested on it's justify-cause,
why not weakly?
The 'Präambel' should read
the main-meta-instruction n
everyone is in duty
2 work on
dropping lex-texts,
as soon as possible,
subito, when they have lost
their meanings, 4 4 that cause,
they were beeing thought of,
not 4 staying
in
law-books
under the spell of
"from now on: 4 ever!"
I
do
believe
in practical
application
of
this
ideal.
Like
an idealistic
and naiv looking
belief,
that is allowed
2
beeing taken more
seriously,
because
it can.
It
can
it
I'm looking 4-ward 2 help U
developing a strong law,
which is always
fresh reduced
2 the maxi
of all thett
actual
needed, no more!
The less, the better!
On our way 2 God
sometimes
law is
needed
and
essential.
But using the right 2 make law,
we allways have 2 keep in mind,
that humans are inperfetti,
only God is
or
can be perfect
-
no man
can be perfetto,
in contrast.
And
it's
like black2white,
these
contrast,
4ever4humans,
be aware!
Therefore is the order,
it's the first duty
of citizenship
beeing in
permanent participation
in
droppen every useless paragraph,
as soo as possible!
And the first
practical-right in usage:
commenting each paragraph
4 all 2 see,
if there is reason
4 concern.
The first practical commandment
is to rough it!
The second commandment
shall be
{ no, I do not mistake me as The Lord, God, one god
or one of the cherubim ... huh, huh, huh
-
Let's stop here, 4 now!
And let's just have a little look
allover this all, here!
There were diverse categories,
that seemingly should be differently beeing treated,
because each has a different function,
that no other of them all should have!
Duty, Forbid, Commandment.
Last not least, the most important: Right.
What about Duty?
>> And always ask 'why?' !!! <<
.
.
.
No.
No godfather is blogging.
We're all godfather.
When working 2gether,
developing 2gethero
- not against one-another -
That's how I see it
and how I deeply feel it.
Nevertheless, I could be wrong
and this could be false,
good feelings fro or to,
incidentally beyond that I'm no teacher,
it's just a work-role,
an - hopefully - challenging,
entertaining style 2 write.
I don't think so.
"Beg your pardon?"
;-)
It's not the way I am thinking,
shure,
concerning the pure.
This is much 2 fast 4 me,
what is going on there in my mind,
regarding or concerning the way it happens.
I could not follow, if I tried ;-)
This writing-work is kind of a thinking, however.
Me, doing so, doing so some kind of
my thinking
- some kind of,
this is as slight difference 2 beeing the same,
but I will not call it a verbal thinking,
in contrast 2 an picture thinking,
because it's no pure one,
each, both of it.
"What Ur talking about, guy?"
Sorry, I think I forgot 2 point it out, clearly!
When we talk of thinking,
we mean 'without words telling/talking/using speech'.
I bet, no one of us
uses speech, when 'normally' thinking.
But the whole day long,
we use speech, while thinking.
With or without saying.
By posing in different roles.
Sad, if there's only one, U own
- poor Lady, poor Mister!
Isn't it kinda boring, is it?
Let's see ... me ... I got: three ..
threehundredthirtyfive roles
- hey, good, eh?
Enough 2 have enough fun with 'em!
And, it's really productive,
switching between the useful at the particular moments,
to'n'fro - fro'n'to
back and forth
and up, down, away - Nirvana!
[ Vor einiger Zeit mal hier verfasst und als Entwurf stehen gelassen;
da ich das alles nicht so sehr gelungen finde, es zu einem runden, guten
Gesamten ohne viel Aufwand umarbeiten zu können, aber auch nicht so
schlecht, es einfach wegzuschmeißen - muss ja nicht irgendeinen Ruf mir
erarbeiten und pflegen, kultivieren, gestalten, verwalten, erhalten:
Innerlich ist die Annahme einer anderen Staatsbürgerschaft eines
Landes, in dem ich mich wieder sicher fühlen kann, wie in den
ersten 11 Jahren als Deutscher in Deutschland.
Als ich mir noch nicht vorstellen konnte, unschuldig
und unter Unschuldbeteuerungen, die gegenüber jeder beteiligten Person
von mir wiederholt geäußert wurden, einfach so - ohne ausreichend großen
Zweifel, der so etwas untersagt hätte, wahrnehmen zu wollen,
bei Richter und Psychologin -
für ganze 3 Wochen in geschlossene Unterbringung
wegzusperren <<< als Strafe für Substanzkonsum, weil es keine illegale Droge war,
sondern legal erhältliche Chemkalie? (dann hätte ich gerne auch den dazugehörigen
Prozess zum Urteilsspruch noch mit im Paket, weil der zu der Suizid-Verleumdung
ja nicht dazu passt, gell?) ]
Kommentare
Kommentar veröffentlichen